Who wins the stablecoin race - Issuers? Fintechs? Protocols?
Since GENIUS, barriers to issuance have never been lower.
Lately, I've been thinking a lot about who captures that dollar - who dictates which onchain dollars users hold?

My thesis is that there are three main camps fighting to capture the dollar:
Issuers: capture reserve yield and building out institutional-grade rails
@circle @Paxos @Tether_to
Fintechs: route balances and keep a share of float
@PayPal @Stablecoin @RevolutApp
Protocols: package on-chain yield and liquidity
@ethena_labs @Hyperliquid @MakerDAO @Mantle_Official
A lot of this hinges on yield, distribution, and compliance.
Examples:
Issuers formalizing partner rewards and bank-grade rails.
Fintechs showing “USD” while routing tokens behind the scenes
Protocols turning basis and RWA income into native savings
What to expect over the next 12 months:
• A long tail of regional and purpose-built dollars (regional stablecoins, payroll, B2B settlement).
• Fintech-issued or white-label dollars inside wallets and neobanks.
• Protocol stables competing on pass-through yield and integrations.
The duopoly era fades as specialization grows
@nic__carter wrote about this in 'The stablecoin duopoly is ending'
1,170
0
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。